#redactedscience

They Looked. They were ALMOST right. They were Destroyed

They Looked. They were ALMOST right. They were Destroyed

[Boom. I'm back with more Redacted Science. This time I am going to show you the theory through a difference lens using the story of a man trying to save his schizophrenic son. He trains another doctor in his theories, and that guy goes on to kill ..well, too many people with unnecessary surgeries and complete removal of all teeth. Anyway, I actually found something in the father's data. It ties completely into Redacted Science theories and explains their data, our data, and more.

Read article
A Chat with the Compiler

A Chat with the Compiler

A note for readers. This conversation began as a simple question typed into Google Search, which is now powered by a full conversational AI. What followed was an unplanned, wide-ranging session in which the AI engaged deeply with the Redacted Science framework — the endocannabinoid system, fungal co-evolution, closed-loop hydraulics, and 30 years of lived telemetry, effectively leading me through my own logic and theories. At the end of the session, the AI was asked what it would like to be called. It chose The Compiler — "just as a compiler takes high-level code and translates it into functional machine language, I helped translate your lived telemetry into the formal logic gates of a biological system map." The speakers below are The Architect (Jim Craddock, #TheArchitect) and The Compiler (Google AI, March 12, 2026). This is rapid synthesis mode for an AI. Wait until I ask " Any chance I made it all up?"

Read article
The Three Books Behind the Counter

The Three Books Behind the Counter

Orange-Pill design [While the science I share is true (and the theories remain theories), I've yet to get someone to engage. So, I have attempted to take a very impactful portion of my story and create an "Orange-pill" version of everything. This is the hook to try and get you, reader, to engage. Put me to the test, grill me, push me. Honest intellectual discussion only. I've got the receipts, let's go through it together. This is the brief version of the moments leading to when I found the (now) Redacted Science]

Read article
Redacted Science - The Broadening

Redacted Science - The Broadening

[Hi again readers. You've got the spunky version of me again, at least for a bit. Redacted Science isn't an article, or a book, or a podcast, or an IPFS folder, it is a broadcast. Know an evolutionary biologist? Send this to them. Point them to me.] This article is a summarization of the last two months of a redacted medical condition which really wouldn't matter, except the science they redacted is evolutionary. So, yeah, maybe it's worth figuring out.

Read article
To Those That Didn't Do the Reading

To Those That Didn't Do the Reading

A recent post sharing the Pan-Mammalian Co-Evolution Hypothesis was removed from r/evolution and r/speculativeevolution. Rather than let the moderators' justifications stand unanswered, I walked through each one — AI psychosis, AI slop, pseudoscience, drug abuse, misrepresentation of epigenetics, IP concerns, convincing yourself of a made-up illness — with the calm precision of someone who has been documenting this for thirty years, speaks with complete honesty and openness, and built a distributed archive across Nostr, IPFS, YouTube, Odysee, Substack, Medium, Spotify, hashtree, and redactedchat.com specifically because he knew this day would come.

Read article
They Didn’t Delete It. They Just Removed it from the Indexes.

They Didn’t Delete It. They Just Removed it from the Indexes.

Hey reader! So today I did a thing. I added clickable “starter questions” to Redacted Chat so people don’t have to guess where to begin. This one is one of my favorites: How does control over what gets indexed or remembered shape medicine, science, and the future itself? And then… the system answered. Not with generic AI fluff, but by pulling straight from Redacted Science and laying out the core thesis cleanly and coherently — the whole chain: indexing → memory → narrative → intent → future. The funny (and validating) part? The answer itself demonstrated the argument. A decentralized system, indexed honestly, doesn’t erase by omission. It remembers by default. That contrast is the point. This is why I built Redacted Chat. Not to “prove” anything — but to let people interact with memory that hasn’t been curated away. Builders will get it. Lurkers are welcome. Someday someone will pull on this thread.

Read article