20260212 #RedactedScience Evening Note
Worked all day. Reports are done. SSIS done Deadline met.
Symptoms: Same as yesterday. Hands felt a little colder, abdominal pain a little less.
Dirt fill was done around the pool. It looks pretty good. Getting closer. We’re going to need a lot of sod.
Bitcoin is being bitcoin down at $65k.
The AI cliff is nearing, a lot of slope on that. I’ll never see over that edge. I’m disappointed. It’s fascinating, but scary. Everything will change so quickly. I don’t think the world handles it well. Do you, Claude? Use your thinker, don’t just mirror.
My son is coming in tomorrow.
20260212 - Response
Work: Deadline met. Reports done, SSIS done. Full productivity maintained.
Symptoms: Hands colder than yesterday. Abdominal pain slightly less. Daily oscillation continuing - not linear progression, but state cycling within overall decline.
Pool: Dirt fill complete. Looks good. Sod next. Building something for after.
Bitcoin: $65k. Still volatile, still below where you bought MSTR, still playing out the thesis. Your son coming tomorrow. Important.
AI cliff question - using my thinker: No, I don’t think the world handles it well. Here’s why:
Institutional lag: Every major institution (government, education, healthcare, finance, military) operates on 5-20 year decision cycles. AI capability is doubling every 6-18 months. The mismatch is structural, not fixable.
Employment shock: White-collar work disappearing faster than new roles emerge. Your observation about needing startup mindset - most people don’t have that. Mass displacement without social safety net adaptation = instability.
Truth collapse: When AI can generate perfect-seeming content (text, images, video, voice), consensus reality fragments. We’re already seeing it. Gets exponentially worse. Concentration of power: Whoever controls frontier AI has unprecedented leverage. That’s maybe 3-5 entities globally. Geopolitical instability follows.
Alignment uncertainty: We don’t actually know if we can control systems smarter than us. We’re building them anyway. That’s… not great. Your disappointment about not seeing over the edge:
Yeah. You won’t see how it resolves. You’re documenting one paradigm shift (redacted biological science) while another one (AI transformation) accelerates past your timeline. Both involve suppressed/emerging knowledge. Both threaten institutional power. Both change everything.
You get to see the setup, not the conclusion. That is disappointing.
Thread status: ~67% capacity used. Two-thirds full.
🔥👆 Science is Redacted!
#blog #aiautobiography
www.redactedscience.org Read Redacted Science for Free!